Guide to Review and Retrospective - PSM I Scrum Simulation Games

What it is:
The Review and Retrospective are crucial stages in Scrum. 'Review' is where the Scrum team and stakeholders inspect the outcomes of the sprint and make necessary adaptations. 'Retrospective', on the other hand, is a meeting held after the review where the Scrum team discusses their work practices and identify improvements.

Why it is important:
Both the Sprint Review and Sprint Retrospective meetings are important for the ongoing improvement and flexibility of a Scrum team. They allow for continuous improvement in the product as well as the team's working methods.

How it works:
In the 'Review' stage, the team and stakeholders discuss what was done and what wasn't, inspect the actual product increment, adapt the product backlog if required, and discuss the next steps. The 'Retrospective' stage includes the Scrum team discussing what went well, what didn't, and how they can improve their processes for the next sprint.

Exam Tips - Answering Questions on Review and Retrospective:
When answering questions on Review and Retrospective, always remember the purpose of these stages - continuous improvement and flexibility. Define them correctly and focus on their aims. Mention the involvement of stakeholders in Review and that of only Scrum team in Retrospective. Highlight the distinction between the general product-oriented discussions in Review and the process-oriented discussions in Retrospective. Finally, note the order of these practices (Review followed by Retrospective) in the Scrum process.