Sprint Burndown Simulation

5 minutes 5 Questions

The Sprint Burndown Simulation is a graphical representation of work to do versus time in a particular Sprint. The progress for the Sprint Burndown chart is tracked and updated each day as work is completed. This gives a simple view of the Sprint progress and also allows for detection of whether th…

Guide to Sprint Burndown Simulation

Sprint Burndown Simulation is a crucial aspect of Scrum practices. Let's learn why it is necessary, what it is, how it works, and how to accurately answer exam questions about it.

Importance: Sprint Burndown Simulation allows teams to visualize their progress in completing the sprint backlog. It promotes transparency and helps with identifying problems early.

Definition: A Sprint Burndown Simulation is a graphical representation of work left to do versus time during a sprint. The vertical axis shows the amount of work remaining, and the horizontal axis represents the time period of the sprint.

Working: The graph starts off with the total hours estimated for the sprint's tasks. As the team completes tasks, the line chart trends downwards. If it zeroes out on the last day, the sprint was successful.

Exam Tips: In an exam setup, it's crucial to showcase your understanding of the various components and functions of a Sprint Burndown chart. Be sure to clarify that the chart is updated daily and reflect on how it helps improve efficiency and predictability of sprints. Additionally, be prepared to answer questions about potential issues the chart might present and probable solutions.

Understanding the purpose and characteristics of the Sprint Burndown Simulation can give you a substantial advantage during your exams.

Test mode:

Exam (Timed)

Practice (With explanations)

Start practice test

PSM I - Sprint Burndown Simulation Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Sprint Burndown Simulation

Question 1

The Sprint Burndown chart showed consistent progress, but towards the end of the Sprint, a critical task was identified, causing a spike. As the Scrum Master, what should your approach be?

Encourage the team to reflect on the late discovery during the Sprint Retrospective to improve future Sprints Suggest to the team to extend the Sprint duration to ensure the critical task is completed, emphasizing the importance of meeting the original sprint objectives Urge the team to split the critical task into smaller tasks and distribute them among team members without revising the sprint goal Direct the Product Owner to re-prioritize backlog items mid-Sprint to accommodate the late discovery without team consultation

Correct Answer: Encourage the team to reflect on the late discovery during the Sprint Retrospective to improve future Sprints

The correct answer promotes continuous improvement by using the Sprint Retrospective to reflect on the process and identify ways to avoid similar situations in the future. The wrong answers suggest approaches that could undermine the principles of Scrum. Directly changing priorities mid-Sprint undermines the Sprint Goal and disrupts team focus. Splitting the task without revising the Sprint Goal may lead to overcommitment and decrease in quality. Extending the Sprint duration violates the Scrum Guide's recommendation to keep Sprints within a consistent duration to maintain a reliable rhythm.

Question 2

A Scrum Master observes that a story that was given high story points is barely moving in the Sprint Burndown chart. This story is becoming a bottleneck for other stories. What should be the Scrum Master's next course of action?

Suggest that the team pause the Sprint to re-assess and re-plan around the bottleneck, potentially shifting priorities or resources. Encourage the Development Team to tackle the high story points item early and consult the Product Owner regarding its priority. Advise the Development Team to split the high story points item into smaller tasks, potentially making it more manageable without immediate consultation with the Product Owner. Recommend the formation of a sub-team dedicated to addressing high story point items exclusively, to ensure such bottlenecks are avoided in the future through specialized focus.

Correct Answer: Encourage the Development Team to tackle the high story points item early and consult the Product Owner regarding its priority.

The most effective course of action involves direct engagement with both the Development Team and the Product Owner to ensure the prioritization and execution of tasks support the Sprint's goals. While splitting high story point items can sometimes provide a temporary solution, it might overlook the importance of stakeholder involvement in reprioritizing work. Pausing a Sprint or forming a dedicated sub-team might disrupt the empiricism, self-organization, and flexibility central to applying Scrum efficiently and effectively.

Question 3

During a sprint, the Development team notices that they are unlikely to finish all backlog items due to an unplanned absence of a team member. What should the Scrum Master do?

Reassess the sprint backlog with the Development team and Product Owner, focusing on maximizing the value delivered by the sprint. Conduct a risk assessment to evaluate the impact of the absence on the project timeline and devise a mitigation strategy that might include scope reduction or timeline adjustment. Encourage the team to redistribute tasks among the remaining members to ensure the completion of the sprint goal. Implement a policy for mandatory overtime for all team members to cover the workload of the absent team member.

Correct Answer: Reassess the sprint backlog with the Development team and Product Owner, focusing on maximizing the value delivered by the sprint.

The Scrum framework emphasizes the importance of collaboration and self-organization among team members when faced with challenges. The correct approach is for the Scrum Master to support the Development team and Product Owner in reviewing the work planned for the sprint and making necessary adjustments based on the team's capacity. This can involve re-prioritizing backlogs or modifying the sprint goal to ensure the delivery of maximum value despite the unforeseen challenge. Encouraging overtime or unilaterally redistributing tasks can lead to burnout and does not respect the self-organizing nature of the team. A risk assessment, while valuable in some contexts, is more formal and might not immediately address the need for adaptation in the current sprint.

🎓 Unlock Premium Access

Professional Scrum Master I + ALL Certifications

🎓 Access to ALL Certifications: Study for any certification on our platform with one subscription
2149 Superior-grade Professional Scrum Master I practice questions
Unlimited practice tests across all certifications
Detailed explanations for every question
PSM I: 5 full exams plus all other certification exams
100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund if unsatisfied
Risk-Free: 7-day free trial with all premium features!

Start Your Free 7-Day Trial

More Sprint Burndown Simulation questions

9 questions (total)

Start 9 question test