Back to Certified Associate in Project Management (CAPM)

Conflict Management

Managing disagreements in a project team

This subtopic covers strategies and techniques to mediate disputes among project team members or between the project team and other stakeholders, to maintain a productive working environment.
5 minutes 5 Questions

Conflict Management is a critical skill for project managers, as conflicts naturally arise in team environments due to diverse perspectives, limited resources, competing priorities, and interpersonal dynamics. In CAPM terms, conflict management involves the process of identifying, addressing, and resolving disagreements constructively to maintain project momentum and team cohesion. The PMBOK Guide recognizes five primary conflict resolution techniques: 1. Withdraw/Avoid: Postponing addressing the issue or stepping back from the conflict situation. Suitable when tensions are high and a cooling-off period is needed. 2. Smooth/Accommodate: Emphasizing areas of agreement rather than differences, sometimes prioritizing relationship maintenance over personal positions. 3. Compromise/Reconcile: Finding middle ground where each party gives up something to reach a mutually acceptable solution. 4. Force/Direct: Using positional authority to impose a solution, typically reserved for urgent situations requiring quick decisions. 5. Collaborate/Problem Solve: Working together to find a solution that fully satisfies all parties' concerns, often producing innovative outcomes but requiring significant time investment. Effective conflict management requires understanding the source of conflicts, which may include: - Scarce resources (budget, equipment, staff) - Scheduling priorities - Technical or professional opinions - Personal working styles - Administrative procedures Project managers should approach conflict proactively by establishing clear communication channels, setting expectations early, documenting agreements, and fostering a team culture that views constructive disagreement as valuable. When conflicts do arise, project managers should address them early, focus on issues rather than personalities, listen actively to all perspectives, and facilitate respectful dialogue. Successful conflict management transforms potential obstacles into opportunities for team growth, improved solutions, and strengthened working relationships.

Conflict Management is a critical skill for project managers, as conflicts naturally arise in team environments due to diverse perspectives, limited resources, competing priorities, and interpersonal…

Concepts covered: Facilitation, Conflict Resolution, Conflict Prevention, Negotiation, Dispute Resolution, Avoidance, Collaboration, Arbitration, Conflict Management Styles, Mediation, Conflict Transformation, Conflict Identification, Conflict Coaching

Test mode:
Start practice test
CAPM - Conflict Management Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)

Question 1

You are a project manager working on a construction project. Due to safety concerns, you decided to change some materials. Which one of the following shows best example of risk avoidance?

Correct Answer: Replacing a hazardous material with a non-hazardous one

The best example of risk avoidance in this case would be 'Replacing a hazardous material with a non-hazardous one'. This is because risk avoidance involves taking steps to completely avoid the risk. By replacing a hazardous material with a non-hazardous one, the project manager is completely avoiding the risk associated with the hazardous material. The other options do not represent risk avoidance. 'Buying insurance for potential accidents due to hazardous materials' is an example of risk transfer, not risk avoidance. 'Training the staff to handle hazardous materials safely' represents risk mitigation, reducing the impact or likelihood, not the avoidance of the risk. 'Transferring the responsibility to handle hazardous materials to a third party' is also considered as risk transfer.

Question 2

During a software implementation project, your team has identified a risk that the current coding structure might be vulnerable to cybersecurity threats. What is the best avoidance strategy in this situation?

Correct Answer: Revamp the coding structure aiming to better security

The best avoidance strategy for identified cybersecurity threats due to a vulnerable coding structure is to 'Revamp the coding structure aiming to better security'. This approach ensures that any known vulnerabilities are addressed, making the software system stronger and less susceptible to potential threats, hence reducing the project risks. The other answers are not optimal because: 'Ignoring the threats and proceeding as planned' does not address the issue and the system will still be vulnerable posing a potential risk to the project. 'Investing in cybersecurity insurance' could serve as a mitigation plan in case of an attack, but it does not prevent the attack from occurring in the first place, hence not a risk avoidance strategy. 'Training the team in cybersecurity, but continuing with the same coding structure' while educating the team, fails to rectify the known vulnerability in the coding structure thus not eliminating the identified risk.

Question 3

In a project where two team members disagree on the implementation of a critical feature, you bring in an external expert who assesses the situation and provides a detailed recommendation. What type of mediation is this?

Correct Answer: Evaluative mediation

The best answer is 'Evaluative mediation.'

Evaluative mediation is characterized by bringing in an external expert who assesses the situation and provides a detailed recommendation. This aligns perfectly with the scenario described in the question, where an external expert is brought in to assess the disagreement between team members and provide a recommendation on the implementation of a critical feature.

Evaluative mediation is particularly useful in technical or specialized disputes where an expert opinion can help resolve the conflict by providing an objective assessment based on their expertise.

The other options are incorrect for the following reasons:

'Transformative mediation focused on relationship improvement' is not the best fit because it primarily aims to improve the relationship between parties rather than providing a specific recommendation on the technical implementation.

'Facilitative mediation with guided problem-solving' involves a mediator who guides the parties to find their own solution, rather than providing an expert recommendation.

'Directive mediation with enforced solutions' goes beyond providing a recommendation and involves enforcing a solution, which is not mentioned in the scenario presented.

Go Premium

Certified Associate in Project Management Preparation Package (2025)

  • Earn 15 PDUs needed for your CAPM certification
  • 4454 Superior-grade Certified Associate in Project Management practice questions.
  • Accelerated Mastery: Deep dive into critical topics to fast-track your mastery.
  • Unlock Effortless CAPM preparation: 5 full exams.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund with no questions if unsatisfied.
  • Bonus: If you upgrade now you get upgraded access to all courses
  • Risk-Free Decision: Start with a 7-day free trial - get premium features at no cost!
More Conflict Management questions
150 questions (total)
Start 100 question test