Back to Disciplined Agile Scrum Master (DASM)

Initiating a DA Team

Steps to form and start a Disciplined Agile team.

This topic covers the initiation phase, including team formation, aligning on goals, setting up work environments, and preparing for execution.
5 minutes 5 Questions

Initiating a Disciplined Agile (DA) team is a critical first step that sets the foundation for success. The process begins with forming the team, ensuring you have the right mix of skills and perspectives needed for the work ahead. This includes identifying key roles such as Product Owner, team mem…

Concepts covered: Forming the Team and Defining Roles, Defining the Team's Way of Working (WoW), Identifying and Engaging Stakeholders, Setting Up the Work Environment, Training and Onboarding Team Members, Setting Up the Technical Infrastructure, Creating the Initial Product Backlog, Establishing Governance and Compliance Practices, Establishing Communication Channels, Defining the Definition of Done, Identifying and Engaging Stakeholders, Establishing Team Logistics and Infrastructure, Tailoring the Approach to the Team's Context, Establishing Team Governance and Policies, Conducting Risk Identification and Management Planning, Identifying Stakeholders and Building Trust, Aligning on Vision and Objectives

Test mode:
Start practice test
DASM - Initiating a DA Team Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Initiating a DA Team

Question 1

In Disciplined Agile, what is the most effective sequence for implementing new team governance policies?

Correct Answer: Propose, pilot test, gather feedback, adjust, then formalize

In Disciplined Agile, implementing new team governance policies requires an iterative, feedback-driven approach. The best sequence is to propose, pilot test, gather feedback, adjust, and then formalize. This approach embodies agile principles by: - Starting small with a proposal - Testing in real conditions - Collecting actual user feedback - Making necessary adjustments - Only formalizing after proving effectiveness Other approaches are less effective because: - Creating detailed documentation first can lead to rigid, untested processes - Full implementation before feedback risks wasting resources on ineffective policies - Focusing on compliance before validation can create resistance and reduce team engagement The iterative, pilot-based approach allows for: - Lower risk of policy failure - Higher team buy-in - Better adaptation to team needs - More flexible implementation - Continuous improvement opportunities

Question 2

In Disciplined Agile, how should team policies be adapted as the team evolves?

Correct Answer: Through regular retrospectives and consensus-based updates

In Disciplined Agile (DA), team policies should evolve through regular retrospectives and consensus-based updates because: This approach aligns with DA principles by: - Empowering teams to self-organize and make their own decisions - Promoting continuous improvement through regular reflection - Ensuring policies remain relevant and effective through team consensus - Supporting adaptive governance rather than prescriptive rules The other options are incorrect because: Centralized governance policies are too rigid and fail to account for team-specific needs and context Quarterly management reviews with top-down adjustments contradict DA's emphasis on team empowerment and continuous adaptation Predetermined templates and annual schedules are too inflexible and do not support the agile principle of responding to change and continuous improvement

Question 3

In Disciplined Agile, how should a Scrum Master balance team autonomy with organizational governance policies?

Correct Answer: Guide the team to adapt governance policies while maintaining alignment with organizational goals

In Disciplined Agile (DA), the ideal balance between team autonomy and organizational governance requires a nuanced approach where teams can adapt and tailor processes while staying aligned with organizational objectives. The correct answer reflects DA's pragmatic approach by guiding teams to adapt governance policies while maintaining organizational alignment. This promotes both team empowerment and organizational consistency. Other options are incorrect because: - Strict application of governance policies contradicts DA's context-driven approach and limits team adaptability - Allowing teams to create their own governance structure based solely on past experiences may lead to misalignment with organizational goals and fragmentation - Following industry standard practices regardless of context goes against DA's principle of choosing and evolving the best approach for your specific situation

More Initiating a DA Team questions
124 questions (total)
Start 100 question test