Behavior Driven Development (BDD)

Correct Answer: Provide training, tools and resources necessary for the team to understand and implement the outside-in approach

When introducing a new method or approach in a team, it's necessary to ensure that all members have adequate understanding and resources to make the shift successfully. This is because they need to comprehend the nuances and benefits of outside-in development thoroughly to implement it efficiently. Improper handling can affect the project's quality and lead to confusion and inefficiency among team members. Therefore, 'Provide training, tools and resources necessary for the team to understand and implement the outside-in approach' is the ideal option. The other options suggest ignoring the new approach completely, forcing the team to adapt without preparation, or applying it only partially, which might not benefit the project or the team to a maximum extent.

Correct Answer: Given the user is on their music library page, when they activate a filter by genre or artist, then the content of the library should be adjusted to display only the content that matches the filter.

The best specification for the filters feature is: 'Given the user is on their music library page, when they activate a filter by genre or artist, then the content of the library should be adjusted to display only the content that matches the filter.' For SpecBDD, the specifications describe actions and states within the system. This answer clearly defines the initial condition (Given), the action taken by the user (When), and the expected result (Then). The other answers either fail to define all three parts or describe unnecessary or incorrect behaviours. For example, it's not necessary for filters to be automatically activated when a user opens the platform, or for the user to be on the 'Discover' page to use filters. The possibility of displaying an empty library if the genre or artist does not exist is a consequence, not a specification for a filter feature. Instead, features should be defined in reaction to user actions, not based on the data available in the system.

Correct Answer: Clarify with the author for more details and then make it more specific.

The most effective course of action when encountering vague or poorly defined steps in a Gherkin specification, especially in an Agile project, would include clarifying the ambiguity before proceeding to avoid confusion or misinterpretation. This often . involves discussing the particular issue with the author to get more context or details, and then amending the specification to make it more precise and understandable to all project members. The other three options are not ideal in such a situation: - Jumping to conclusions about what the author meant would likely result to misunderstandings and could potentially lead to incorrect implementation of the project scope. Proper communication is crucial in Agile projects. - Ignoring the vague description and starting to code based on that increase the risk of deviating from the intended functionality or scope of the project, and may also lead to wasted effort subsequently. - Deleting the step and writing a new one on your own without consulting with the author or other stakeholders would not guarantee that the new step aligns with the actual project requirements or scope. Collaboration and clear communication are crucial in Agile environments, thus actual and effective resolution of the matter would not omit those.