Pair Programming

Correct Answer: Implement WIP (Work in Progress) limits on tasks in a given sprint and discourage multitasking

The best approach to handle the scenario where teams face delays and lack of focus due to continuous multitasking is to 'implement Work in Progress (WIP) limits on tasks in a given sprint and discourage multitasking.' In the context of Agile methodology, WIP limits help teams to focus singly on the task at hand reducing the inherent waste that comes from multitasking and task-switching. Once the team completes a task, it can then pick up the next priority. Now, let's consider why other answers are incorrect: 'ask the team to put in more hours to manage all tasks' is not a sustainable solution as it can lead to burnout and does not solve the underlying problem of multitasking. Ignoring the situation assuming it will resolve naturally will not bring about any improvement, rather it can lead to a further lack of focus and productivity. 'Encourage multitasking more to build the team's ability' is not an effective strategy, because numerous research studies have shown that multitasking reduces efficiency and quality of work.

Correct Answer: Research for a more efficient method and share findings with the driver.

The ideal scenario would be for the navigator to research a more efficient method and share their findings with the driver. This approach maintains the collaborative spirit of pair programming and would allow the driver to learn and implement more efficient methods moving forward. The other options are not ideal because directly implementing a new method without the driver's involvement negates the collaborative effort, criticizing the driver serves no constructive purpose, and just allowing the driver to continue with an inefficient method would result in an overall decrease in productivity and effectiveness.

Correct Answer: Communicate your concerns about the unbalanced participation to the driver and propose regular role swapping.

In an Agile sprint, each member's contribution is important, and a balanced participation between the driver and navigator during a coding session is essential for effective pair programming. The best course of action in this scenario would be for the navigator to communicate their concerns about the unbalanced participation to the driver and propose regular role swapping. This fosters open communication, one of the core values of Agile, and allows balanced contribution to the project. Passive actions such as holding on in quiet hope of improvement, or letting the driver continue due to their experience defeats the purpose of pair programming and creates an unhealthy team dynamic. Reporting to the project manager ought to be a last resort, when efforts for resolving the issue at the team level fail.