Back to PMI Agile Certified Practitioner (PMI-ACP)

Retrospectives

Regular assessment of team's process.

Retrospectives, or sprint retrospectives, are meetings held by teams at the end of each sprint in an Agile framework to discuss what was successful and what could be improved in the next sprint. It is a form of process assessment.
5 minutes 5 Questions

Retrospectives, in the context of the PMI Agile Certified Practitioner (PMI-ACP), are structured team meetings that occur at regular intervals, typically at the end of a sprint or iteration. They provide a forum for the team to reflect on their work process, identify what went well, what didn't, and create actionable improvement plans. The primary purpose of retrospectives is continuous improvement. By examining past performance and experiences, teams can adapt their practices to enhance productivity, quality, and team satisfaction. Unlike traditional post-project reviews, agile retrospectives happen frequently throughout the project lifecycle, enabling real-time adjustments and learning. A typical retrospective follows a structured format: 1. Set the stage: Create a safe environment for open discussion. 2. Gather data: Collect information about what happened during the sprint. 3. Generate insights: Analyze the data to identify patterns and root causes. 4. Decide what to do: Determine specific actions to improve. 5. Close the retrospective: End on a positive note and document action items. Various techniques can facilitate retrospectives, including: - Start-Stop-Continue: Identify what to start doing, stop doing, and continue doing. - Sailboat: Visualize winds (helping forces), anchors (hindrances), rocks (risks), and the destination (goals). - Mad-Sad-Glad: Capture emotional responses to the sprint events. The Scrum Master or Agile Coach typically facilitates retrospectives, ensuring the team focuses on constructive criticism rather than blame. The entire team participates, including the Product Owner when appropriate. Effective retrospectives lead to specific, measurable improvements implemented in subsequent sprints, fostering a culture of transparency, inspection, and adaptation - core principles in agile methodologies.

Retrospectives, in the context of the PMI Agile Certified Practitioner (PMI-ACP), are structured team meetings that occur at regular intervals, typically at the end of a sprint or iteration. They pro…

Concepts covered: Action Planning, Adaptation, Transparency, Team Alignment, Collaborative Problem-Solving, Root Cause Analysis, Feedback Loop, Retrospective Facilitation, Inspection, Continuous Improvement

Test mode:
Start practice test
PMI-ACP - Retrospectives Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)

Question 1

During an inspection, the ScrumMaster realizes that several key stakeholders are not adapting to the Agile framework as expected. What would be the correct step going forward?

Correct Answer: Provide training and support to those stakeholders to ensure a better understanding of Agile principles and practices.

The correct step going forward would be to provide training and support to those stakeholders to ensure a better understanding of Agile principles and practices. As ScrumMaster, their role includes facilitating understanding and practice of Agile. By taking the time to educate and support stakeholders, they can help them adapt more efficiently to the Agile framework. The idea to ignore the situation is not viable because it doesn't solve the problem and contradicts the ScrumMaster's responsibilities. Asking the stakeholders to leave the project is neither productive nor professional and doesn't facilitate a collaborative environment. Lastly, enforcing the Agile rules without considering their feedback is not in line with Agile principles, which values individuals and interactions over processes and tools.

Question 2

A team member has confided in you about troubles with the technology stack used in the project. However, they don't communicate during the stand-up. How do you ensure transparency as a Scrum Master?

Correct Answer: Encourage the team member to voice their concerns in the next meeting and reassure them that the team’s role is to support each other.

The best approach in this case is the one stated in the first answer, which encourages the team member to voice their concerns in the next meeting and comforting them that the team’s role is to support each other. Transparency and openness is a key facet of Agile methodologies. The Scrum Master, as a facilitator, should encourage the team member to share their concerns with the rest of the team, so that they could collectively find a resolution for the problem. This approach also respects the individual's willingness to share. In contrast, sliding over the issue, as suggested in the second answer, might result in the problem persisting and may impact project success. Sharing the concern without the team member's consent (which is proposed in the third answer) may break trust within the team, while trivializing the problems as just a tech issue to be resolved (in the fourth answer) can risk alienating team members and implying their concerns are not valued.

Question 3

Your Agile team is struggling to establish proper alignment. Certain members don't seem to grasp the Agile principles even though they attend the daily stand-ups and retrospectives. What would you do as an Agile coach?

Correct Answer: Organize a separate hands-on Agile principles' workshop to reinforce their understanding and alignment.

The best course of action as an Agile coach, when your team is struggling to understand and align with Agile principles, is to 'Organize a separate hands-on Agile principles' workshop to reinforce their understanding and alignment'. This approach addresses the problem directly by reinforcing the Agile principles in a practical, hands-on context. 'Ignore the issue hoping eventually they will get aligned with time' is not a proactive approach and could lead to further misalignment. Agile requires adaptability and proactive problem-solving'Tell them to read Agile principles on their own and understand it' does not provide the team with the necessary guidance and applied understanding that they would gain from a hands-on workshop. 'Subject the underperforming members to a performance review.' is not beneficial in this regard as it will not assist in their understanding of Agile principles and will foster a negative culture which contradicts with the Agile's emphasis on collaboration and continuous improvement.

Go Premium

PMI Agile Certified Practitioner Preparation Package (2025)

  • 3432 Superior-grade PMI Agile Certified Practitioner practice questions.
  • Accelerated Mastery: Deep dive into critical topics to fast-track your mastery.
  • Unlock Effortless PMI-ACP preparation: 5 full exams.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund with no questions if unsatisfied.
  • Bonus: If you upgrade now you get upgraded access to all courses
  • Risk-Free Decision: Start with a 7-day free trial - get premium features at no cost!
More Retrospectives questions
102 questions (total)
Start 100 question test