Back to PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)

Solution Evaluation and Validation

Assessing solutions to ensure they meet business needs and requirements.

This topic focuses on evaluating implemented solutions against requirements, validating that business needs are met, and identifying any gaps or areas for improvement.
5 minutes 5 Questions

Solution Evaluation and Validation is a critical knowledge area in business analysis that focuses on assessing how well implemented solutions meet business needs and deliver intended value. This process spans both before and after solution implementation. Prior to implementation, business analysts…

Concepts covered: Defining Acceptance Criteria, Risk Assessment and Mitigation, Stakeholder Feedback Collection, Requirements Verification and Validation, Solution Performance Evaluation, Usability Testing and Evaluation, Solution Readiness Assessment, Benefit Realization Measurement, Post-Implementation Review

Test mode:
Start practice test
PMI-PBA - Solution Evaluation and Validation Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Solution Evaluation and Validation

Question 1

When stakeholders provide conflicting feedback on requirements, what should be the Business Analyst's primary response?

Correct Answer: Schedule focused feedback sessions with each stakeholder group to understand their specific needs

The best response when stakeholders provide conflicting feedback is to schedule focused feedback sessions with each stakeholder group to understand their specific needs. This approach allows the Business Analyst to: - Fully understand the underlying reasons for different requirements - Identify potential common ground between stakeholders - Gather detailed context for each stakeholder's perspective - Find opportunities for requirement reconciliation - Build stakeholder relationships and trust Other approaches are problematic because: - Simply documenting feedback and going with the most frequent suggestions fails to address underlying needs and may miss critical requirements from key stakeholders - Escalating to the project sponsor too early avoids the BA's responsibility to analyze and resolve conflicts, and may result in decisions made with incomplete information - Averaging out perspectives or implementing compromise solutions may result in requirements that don't fully meet anyone's needs and could compromise the project's success

Question 2

What is the most valuable method for capturing stakeholder feedback during early project phases?

Correct Answer: Conducting structured interviews with key stakeholders

Conducting structured interviews with key stakeholders is the most effective method for capturing feedback during early project phases because: 1. It allows for in-depth, personal interactions with stakeholders 2. Provides opportunities for follow-up questions and clarification 3. Enables the capture of non-verbal cues and detailed context 4. Builds relationships and trust with key stakeholders 5. Allows for real-time adaptation of questions based on responses Why other options are less effective: Automated feedback systems are too impersonal and complex for early phases, and may miss crucial contextual information. Questionnaires are limited in their ability to capture detailed context and may result in misinterpretation of responses. They also lack the interactive element needed for proper requirements gathering. Large group sessions can be dominated by vocal participants, while quieter stakeholders may feel hesitant to share their views. Group dynamics can also lead to groupthink and may not capture individual concerns effectively.

Question 3

Which technique is most appropriate for managing stakeholder feedback on complex business requirements across multiple departments?

Correct Answer: Creating a feedback prioritization matrix based on strategic business value

Creating a feedback prioritization matrix based on strategic business value is the most effective approach because: 1. It aligns stakeholder feedback with organizational objectives 2. It provides a structured method to evaluate and rank feedback importance 3. It helps manage competing interests across departments 4. It ensures resources are allocated to the most strategically valuable requirements Why other approaches are less effective: Establishing a comprehensive collection system focuses too much on gathering data rather than managing and prioritizing it effectively. Implementing a centralized repository addresses storage and communication but doesn't help with decision-making or resolving conflicts between departments. Conducting sequential department reviews creates unnecessary delays and may lead to siloed thinking rather than collaborative problem-solving.

More Solution Evaluation and Validation questions
97 questions (total)
Start 97 question test