Back to PMI Risk Management Professional (PMI-RMP)

Risk Thresholds and Triggers

Defining risk levels that warrant action.

This topic explains how to establish thresholds and identify triggers that signal when risk responses should be implemented.
5 minutes 5 Questions

Risk Thresholds and Triggers are critical components in the PMI Risk Management framework that help organizations determine when action should be taken on identified risks. Risk Thresholds represent the predetermined levels or boundaries of risk exposure that an organization is willing to accept b…

Concepts covered: Understanding Risk Appetite and Risk Thresholds, Establishing Quantitative and Qualitative Risk Thresholds, Communication of Risk Thresholds and Triggers to Stakeholders and Project Team, Risk Thresholds and Triggers in Agile and Adaptive Environments, Risk Thresholds in Risk Response Planning, Role of Risk Thresholds in Risk Prioritization and Ranking, Legal and Regulatory Impacts on Risk Thresholds and Triggers, Identifying and Monitoring Risk Triggers, Adjusting Risk Thresholds and Triggers Over Time

Test mode:
Start practice test
PMI-RMP - Risk Thresholds and Triggers Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Risk Thresholds and Triggers

Question 1

How should risk thresholds and triggers be adjusted when transitioning from traditional to Agile project delivery methods?

Correct Answer: Risk thresholds should be reviewed and updated at the end of each iteration based on sprint outcomes

In Agile project management, risk assessment and management is an iterative and adaptive process that aligns with the core principles of Agile methodology. The best approach is to review and update risk thresholds at the end of each iteration based on sprint outcomes because: - It allows for continuous adaptation to changing project conditions - It leverages empirical data from completed sprints - It maintains alignment with Agile's iterative nature - It enables teams to adjust based on actual performance and emerging risks The other options are incorrect because: - Keeping risk thresholds constant throughout all sprints contradicts Agile's adaptive nature and prevents learning from experience - Adjusting thresholds only at major program increments is too infrequent and misses opportunities for early risk response - Daily modification of risk thresholds by the Scrum Master is excessive, impractical, and creates unnecessary overhead that doesn't align with proper risk management practices

Question 2

How should risk thresholds be documented in relation to project stakeholders' risk tolerance levels?

Correct Answer: Using quantifiable metrics and specific trigger points for each stakeholder group

Risk thresholds should be documented using quantifiable metrics and specific trigger points for each stakeholder group because: 1. Different stakeholders have varying risk tolerance levels based on their roles and interests 2. Quantifiable metrics provide clear, measurable parameters for decision-making 3. Specific trigger points enable prompt action when thresholds are reached 4. This approach allows for customized risk management strategies per stakeholder The other options are incorrect because: Detailed risk matrices across all departments may be too complex and rigid, potentially missing unique stakeholder needs. Standardized risk tolerance charts for all stakeholders fail to account for different risk appetites and responsibilities among stakeholder groups. General uniform guidelines are too broad and do not address the varying risk tolerance levels of different stakeholders, making them ineffective for proper risk management.

Question 3

When implementing risk thresholds in an Agile environment using rolling wave planning, what strategy should be prioritized?

Correct Answer: Adjust thresholds based on retrospective feedback and emerging patterns from completed iterations

In an Agile environment using rolling wave planning, adjusting risk thresholds based on retrospective feedback and emerging patterns from completed iterations is the optimal strategy because: This approach aligns with Agile principles by: - Embracing iterative learning and adaptation - Using real data from completed work - Incorporating team feedback and actual project performance - Allowing for continuous improvement The other options are incorrect because: Quarterly intervals are too rigid and formal for an Agile environment, limiting the ability to respond to rapid changes and emerging risks. Maintaining fixed thresholds contradicts Agile's adaptive nature and prevents the team from responding to changing project conditions. Relying exclusively on formal change control and steering committee approval creates unnecessary bureaucracy and delays, which conflicts with Agile's emphasis on flexibility and quick response to change.

More Risk Thresholds and Triggers questions
102 questions (total)
Start 100 question test