Scaling in Distributed Scrum

Correct Answer: Implement a 'Scrum of Scrums' approach to improve coordination

The best answer to solve the issue faced by a distributed scrum team having integration issues is to 'Implement a 'Scrum of Scrums' approach to improve coordination'. The 'Scrum of Scrums' is a scaling approach in scrum that helps handle integration issues by enhancing collaboration and synchronization across different sub-teams in a larger project. This approach creates a scrum team made up of representatives from each sub-team who meet to discuss progress, dependencies, and alignment, facilitating better integration of work from different sub-teams. Each representative shares the progress of their sub-team which promotes alignment, transparency, and visibility. 'Mandating more hours of work for the sub-teams' is not a viable solution as it might lead to burnout without necessarily addressing the underlying issue of integrating work from different sub-teams. 'Asking sub-teams to work independently and not interface with each other' removes the essence of collaboration that's so crucial in scrum and it won't help to integrate the sub-teams' work. Lastly, 'Forming a new team' is a drastic measure that's hardly suitable if the issue lies with integrating work across sub-teams and not with the composition or skills of the teams themselves.

Correct Answer: Involve more members in backlog refinement and divide the work

In Scrum methodologies, the Product Owner is the one responsible for managing the Product Backlog. However, when the scope of the project increases, it can become challenging for the Product Owner to manage it single-handedly. In such cases, the apt approach, according to Scrum guidelines, is to involve more team members in backlog refinement and divide the work. This approach streamlines the backlog management process and makes it manageable despite the large scale of the project. Answer 'Ignore the problem hoping it will resolve itself' is certainly not a correct approach as it would lead to bigger issues in future. 'Assign another Product Owner' might seem like a solution but in Scrum framework it's not recommended to have multiple Product Owners for the same backlog as it may cause confusion and conflicts. 'Reduce the number of items in the Product Backlog at any cost' is also not a correct solution as it involves inefficiently rushing through the backlog prioritisation and may lead to overlooking important items.

Correct Answer: Implement a Scrum of Scrums approach to maintain clearer visibility of task assignments.

The best solution in this scenario is to 'Implement a Scrum of Scrums approach to maintain clearer visibility of task assignments'. A common problem in a Scrum team is overlapping tasks due to the large scale of the project. In such circumstances, using a Scrum of Scrums technique can be highly effective. This method enables multiple Scrum teams to be interconnected for better coordination, communication, and project tracking. The Scrum of Scrums functions in the same way as a normal Scrum meeting does, with each team collectively represented by the Scrum Master or a designated team member who leads the meeting. This approach promotes visibility and transparency, allowing all teams to stay updated with each other's progress, reducing the chance of overlapping tasks The option 'Let the team members resolve the issue themselves' is not practical in large-scale projects involving several teams. In this scenario, without a systematic process in place, the complexity will likely lead to further confusion and miscommunication. 'Ignoring the problem assuming that the overlap will eventually decrease' is not an effective solution. In Agile and Scrum practices, problems are confronted and addressed as they occur rather than ignored. Ignoring the issue could lead to inefficiencies, a drop in productivity, and potential team conflict While 'Avoid assigning tasks and allow team members to pick their own tasks' might sound like a good idea, it can also lead to chaos without proper coordination. Tasks might remain unassigned, and conflicts could arise over who should perform what task.