Team Satisfaction

Correct Answer: Team sentiment surveys combined with velocity trends

Team sentiment surveys combined with velocity trends is the most effective metric because: - It balances both emotional and performance data - Sentiment surveys capture qualitative feedback about team morale, engagement, and satisfaction - Velocity trends provide context about team performance and workload balance - The combination allows correlation between team wellbeing and productivity - It supports continuous improvement by identifying patterns over time The other options are less effective because: Sprint completion and burndown analysis with happiness scores focuses too heavily on output metrics rather than team health indicators. Individual performance reviews linked to productivity metrics can create unhealthy competition and undermine team cohesion. Daily happiness scores with story points is too frequent and may lead to metric fatigue, while potentially missing deeper satisfaction trends.

Correct Answer: Foster psychological safety by establishing regular feedback sessions and addressing concerns proactively

Fostering psychological safety through regular feedback sessions and proactively addressing concerns is the most effective strategy because: 1. It creates an environment where team members feel safe expressing their anxieties and concerns 2. It enables early identification and resolution of issues before they escalate 3. It aligns with Disciplined Agile principles of continuous improvement and adaptation 4. It builds trust between leadership and team members during change Why other approaches are less effective: Team-building activities and social events, while helpful for morale, don't address the root causes of anxiety during organizational change. Creating detailed documentation and extended training sessions may add to the team's stress and cognitive load rather than alleviating anxiety. Implementing a reward system focuses on external motivation when the core issue is emotional and psychological safety. Individual recognition might even create competition when team cohesion is needed most.

Correct Answer: Implement a pre-release preparation phase with balanced workload distribution and clear communication channels

The best approach focuses on addressing the root cause of release stress through preventive measures rather than reactive solutions. Implementing a pre-release preparation phase with balanced workload distribution and clear communication channels is the optimal solution because it: - Addresses workload management proactively - Establishes clear expectations and communication paths - Helps prevent bottlenecks before they occur - Aligns with Agile principles of sustainable development Why other options are suboptimal: Team building exercises and mindfulness sessions, while beneficial for general wellbeing, treat symptoms rather than the underlying cause of release stress. Extending working hours contradicts Agile principles of sustainable pace and work-life balance, potentially leading to burnout and decreased quality. Mandatory role rotation during high-stress periods could introduce additional complexity and risks when stability is most needed. This might increase stress rather than reduce it.