Agile Governance and Metrics in Disciplined Agile

Correct Answer: To provide insights that enable better decision-making and process improvement

The primary purpose of Agile governance metrics in Disciplined Agile is to provide insights that enable better decision-making and process improvement. This aligns with Agile's core principles of continuous improvement and adaptive planning. This is correct because: - It emphasizes using metrics for insight and improvement - It supports data-driven decision making - It maintains agility while providing meaningful measurement The other options are incorrect because: - Establishing strict control mechanisms contradicts Agile's flexible and adaptive nature - Generating reports purely for compliance with traditional methodologies goes against Agile's focus on value delivery - Creating comprehensive documentation for historical records places too much emphasis on documentation over working solutions and continuous improvement In Disciplined Agile, metrics should serve as enablers for improvement and better decisions, not as bureaucratic overhead or control mechanisms.

Correct Answer: Using velocity trends and cycle time over multiple iterations

Using velocity trends and cycle time over multiple iterations is the most appropriate governance approach in Disciplined Agile for measuring team performance because: It focuses on long-term patterns and trends rather than short-term metrics It considers both velocity and cycle time, providing a balanced view of productivity and efficiency Measuring across multiple iterations helps identify sustainable patterns and improvements Why other approaches are less effective: Tracking individual metrics contradicts agile principles of team-based performance and can harm collaboration Measuring from a single iteration provides insufficient data for meaningful performance analysis and may lead to incorrect conclusions Comparing to industry standards fails to account for team-specific contexts and circumstances, which is a key principle in Disciplined Agile's context-driven approach

Correct Answer: It focuses on minimizing overhead while gathering meaningful data

In Disciplined Agile, Lean Governance aims to maximize value while keeping overhead low. Metrics collection should be purposeful and streamlined, focusing on gathering data that provides meaningful insights for decision-making and improvement. The correct answer reflects the core principle of Lean Governance in DA - collecting meaningful metrics with minimal overhead, which helps teams maintain agility while ensuring necessary oversight. The other options are incorrect because: - Emphasizing extensive documentation and detailed progress reports creates unnecessary bureaucracy and goes against lean principles - Mandating standardized procedures regardless of context contradicts DA's context-sensitive approach - Requiring comprehensive audit trails of all activities creates excessive overhead and doesn't align with lean principles Lean Governance in DA promotes a balanced approach that ensures adequate oversight and metrics collection while maintaining team efficiency and flexibility.