Peer Reviews and Inspections

Correct Answer: Record defects in a tracking system and assign responsible team members for resolution

Recording defects in a tracking system and assigning responsible team members for resolution is the most effective approach because: - It ensures systematic documentation of all identified issues - Establishes clear accountability for resolution - Enables proper tracking and monitoring of defect status - Facilitates effective follow-up and closure - Aligns with best practices in defect management The other options are incorrect because: Sending all defects to development team fails to properly categorize and prioritize issues, and may overwhelm the team with items that could be handled by other stakeholders. Asking participants to fix their identified defects creates inconsistency in resolution approaches and lacks proper tracking and coordination. Creating a report for senior management adds unnecessary delay and bureaucracy to the resolution process, when most defects should be handled at the appropriate working level.

Correct Answer: Take notes and clarify questions when asked

In a peer review meeting, the original author should take a passive role by taking notes and answering questions when asked. This allows for an objective review process and enables other participants to freely discuss and identify potential issues. The other options are incorrect because: Leading the discussion would prevent objective review since the author would be controlling the flow and potentially steering the conversation. Actively defending the work creates a biased atmosphere and may discourage reviewers from raising valid concerns. Facilitating the meeting should be done by a neutral party to ensure an unbiased review process. Having the author facilitate could create conflicts of interest and reduce the effectiveness of the review.

Correct Answer: To identify defects and prepare questions for discussion during the meeting

The primary purpose of reviewing materials before a peer review meeting is to allow participants to identify potential issues and prepare questions for productive discussion during the actual meeting. This approach maximizes the effectiveness of the meeting time by ensuring participants come prepared with thoughtful insights and specific points to discuss. When reviewers have time to analyze materials in advance, they can provide more meaningful feedback and engage in deeper discussions. The other options are less relevant: Establishing timelines is typically done during project planning, not during peer review preparation. Determining future stakeholder participation is a separate organizational task that would occur during resource planning phases. Creating documentation lists is a project management activity that should be completed well before peer reviews begin.