Back to Change Control and Schedule Updates

Schedule Variance Analysis and Corrective Actions

5 minutes 5 Questions

Schedule Variance Analysis and Corrective Actions are critical components in effective project management and scheduling. Schedule variance analysis involves comparing the planned progress of a project against the actual progress to identify any deviations from the schedule baseline. This process helps project managers determine whether the project is ahead of schedule, on track, or behind schedule. By utilizing tools such as the Schedule Variance (SV) and Schedule Performance Index (SPI) from Earned Value Management (EVM), project managers can quantify the extent of any variances. SV measures the difference between the work actually performed and the work planned, while SPI indicates the efficiency of time utilization. These metrics provide insights that are essential for informed decision-making. When variances are identified, corrective actions are developed to address any negative impacts on the schedule. Corrective actions may include reallocating resources, adjusting task dependencies, implementing schedule compression techniques like crashing or fast-tracking, or revising project plans and timelines. The goal is to realign the project with its original objectives and minimize delays. Effective implementation of corrective actions requires collaboration among project team members and stakeholders. It often involves analyzing the root causes of variances, assessing the feasibility of proposed solutions, and obtaining necessary approvals through established change control processes. Documentation of both the variances and the corrective actions is essential for transparency and future reference. In summary, Schedule Variance Analysis and Corrective Actions enable proactive management of the project schedule. They allow project managers to quickly identify issues, evaluate their impact, and implement strategies to keep the project on track. This approach enhances the likelihood of project success by ensuring timely delivery and efficient use of resources.

Schedule Variance Analysis and Corrective Actions

Introduction

Schedule Variance Analysis and Corrective Actions are critical components of project time management, especially for PMI-SP certification exams. This guide explains these concepts thoroughly, their importance, application, and how to approach exam questions on this topic.

Why Schedule Variance Analysis is Important

Schedule variance analysis is essential because it:

• Provides early warning of schedule problems
• Quantifies the magnitude of schedule deviations
• Helps determine if corrective actions are necessary
• Enables data-driven decision making
• Supports stakeholder communication about project status
• Serves as a key performance indicator of project health

What is Schedule Variance Analysis?

Schedule Variance Analysis is a technique used to evaluate the difference between planned and actual schedule performance. It is typically performed as part of Earned Value Management (EVM) and includes:

• Schedule Variance (SV): The difference between the earned value and planned value (SV = EV - PV)
• Schedule Performance Index (SPI): The ratio of earned value to planned value (SPI = EV/PV)

A negative SV or an SPI less than 1.0 indicates the project is behind schedule, while a positive SV or SPI greater than 1.0 indicates the project is ahead of schedule.

How Schedule Variance Analysis Works

1. Data Collection: Gather actual progress data from team members and systems
2. Comparison: Compare actual progress against the baseline schedule
3. Calculation: Calculate schedule variances and performance indices
4. Analysis: Analyze the root causes of variances
5. Reporting: Document findings in performance reports
6. Decision Making: Determine if corrective actions are needed

Corrective Actions for Schedule Variances

When schedule variances are identified, potential corrective actions may include:

• Fast tracking: Performing activities in parallel that were originally scheduled sequentially
• Crashing: Adding resources to critical path activities to reduce duration
• Scope reduction: Reducing or eliminating certain deliverables (requires change control)
• Resource reallocation: Moving resources from non-critical to critical activities
• Schedule rebaselining: Setting a new approved schedule baseline (last resort)
• Work calendar adjustments: Adding overtime or additional shifts

Implementation Process for Corrective Actions

1. Identify options: Brainstorm possible corrective actions
2. Analyze impacts: Assess the impact of each option on scope, time, cost, quality, and risks
3. Select strategy: Choose the most appropriate corrective action
4. Document changes: Update project documents through change control processes
5. Implement actions: Execute the approved corrective actions
6. Monitor results: Track the effectiveness of corrective actions

Exam Tips: Answering Questions on Schedule Variance Analysis and Corrective Actions

1. Understand the formulas:
• Memorize SV = EV - PV and SPI = EV/PV
• Practice interpreting what positive and negative values mean

2. Know the thresholds:
• SV = 0 and SPI = 1.0 mean on schedule
• SV < 0 and SPI < 1.0 mean behind schedule
• SV > 0 and SPI > 1.0 mean ahead of schedule

3. Connect analysis to actions:
• Remember that different variances require different corrective approaches
• Be familiar with which corrective actions are appropriate in specific scenarios

4. Focus on process order:
• Understand that analysis always comes before corrective action
• Change requests must go through proper change control procedures

5. Apply situational judgment:
• Consider project constraints when selecting corrective actions
• Think about the trade-offs between different corrective strategies

6. Mind your stakeholders:
• Remember that schedule changes often need stakeholder approval
• Communication is essential when implementing corrective actions

7. Look for red herrings:
• Some exam options may suggest taking no action when variances are significant
• Other options might suggest excessive actions for minor variances

8. Practice calculations:
• Work through sample problems to become comfortable with the math
• Be prepared to interpret EVM graphs and charts

By mastering Schedule Variance Analysis and Corrective Actions, you'll be well-prepared to handle these topics on the PMI-SP exam and apply these crucial skills in real-world project management scenarios.

Test mode:
Start practice test
PMI-SP - Change Control and Schedule Updates Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)

Question 1

When managing schedule recovery efforts, what is the most effective sequence for evaluating schedule compression techniques?

Correct Answer: Analyze fast tracking opportunities first, then consider crashing if needed

Fast tracking first, followed by crashing as needed, is the most effective sequence for schedule compression because: 1. Fast tracking is typically less costly and less risky than crashing, as it involves overlapping activities that would normally be done in sequence 2. If fast tracking alone achieves the desired schedule recovery, there's no need to incur the additional costs associated with crashing 3. Starting with the least expensive and least risky option preserves budget and maintains better control over project risks Other approaches are incorrect because: - Resource leveling actually tends to extend project duration rather than compress it - Using crashing as the primary method unnecessarily increases costs when faster, less expensive options might work - Attempting compression and resource optimization simultaneously can create confusion and potentially lead to resource conflicts Best practice is to evaluate and implement the least costly and least risky options first, then escalate to more aggressive measures only if necessary.

Question 2

In a project where corrective actions are needed, which of the following responses best describes the appropriate use of schedule compression techniques?

Correct Answer: Fast tracking may be applied to activities with minimal dependencies, while crashing requires additional resources

The best approach to schedule compression uses the most cost-effective technique first. Fast tracking is a technique that involves performing activities in parallel that would normally be done in sequence. This can be done with minimal dependencies and typically has no additional cost. Crashing involves adding resources to activities to speed them up, which increases costs. This makes it a less preferred initial option compared to fast tracking. The other answers are incorrect because: - Applying fast tracking only after crashing is inefficient and unnecessarily expensive, as it uses the more costly method first - Applying compression techniques equally to all activities is inefficient since only activities on the critical path impact the overall schedule - Applying crashing to non-critical path activities first makes no sense as these activities have float and do not impact the project end date

Question 3

During schedule performance monitoring, a project manager identifies significant overruns in multiple critical path activities. What is the most appropriate initial action to take?

Correct Answer: Perform detailed root cause analysis of the schedule variances on critical path activities

When faced with significant schedule overruns in critical path activities, the most appropriate first step is to perform a detailed root cause analysis of the schedule variances. This approach allows for: 1. Understanding the true causes of the delays 2. Identifying patterns or systemic issues 3. Developing targeted and effective corrective actions 4. Making informed decisions based on data Other options are premature and potentially wasteful: Applying fast tracking and crashing techniques before understanding the root causes could worsen the situation and waste resources. Adding overtime and resources across all delayed activities is a reactive approach that may be unnecessary and costly if the real issues lie elsewhere. Requesting a complete baseline revision is an extreme measure that should only be considered after understanding and addressing the root causes, as it can mask performance issues and complicate project tracking.

Go Premium

PMI Scheduling Professional Preparation Package (2025)

  • 3429 Superior-grade PMI Scheduling Professional practice questions.
  • Accelerated Mastery: Deep dive into critical topics to fast-track your mastery.
  • Unlock Effortless PMI-SP preparation: 5 full exams.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund with no questions if unsatisfied.
  • Bonus: If you upgrade now you get upgraded access to all courses
  • Risk-Free Decision: Start with a 7-day free trial - get premium features at no cost!
More Schedule Variance Analysis and Corrective Actions questions
12 questions (total)
Start 12 question test