Rolling Wave Planning

Correct Answer: Rolling Wave Planning

The most effective approach for creating flexible plans in a project with high uncertainty in requirements and resources would be Rolling Wave Planning. Explanation: Rolling Wave Planning is an iterative planning technique where the project plan is developed in waves as the project progresses and more information becomes available. This approach allows for flexibility and adaptability in the face of uncertainty. Here's why Rolling Wave Planning is the most suitable choice: 1. High uncertainty in requirements: With Rolling Wave Planning, detailed planning is done only for the near-term work, while future work is planned at a higher level. As the project progresses and requirements become clearer, the plan is refined and detailed for the upcoming wave. This allows the team to adapt to changes in requirements as they emerge. 2. High uncertainty in resources: Rolling Wave Planning enables the team to allocate resources based on the current understanding of the project needs. As the project progresses and resource requirements become more apparent, the plan can be adjusted accordingly, ensuring optimal resource utilization. 3. Flexibility: Rolling Wave Planning allows for flexibility in the project plan. As new information becomes available, the team can revisit and update the plan for upcoming waves, making necessary adjustments to accommodate changes in requirements, resources, or project priorities. 4. Iterative approach: Rolling Wave Planning aligns well with iterative project management methodologies, such as Agile, where work is delivered in short iterations, and feedback is incorporated into the planning process. This iterative nature allows for continuous improvement and adaptation. The other options mentioned, while useful in certain contexts, may not be as effective for the given scenario: - Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) is a hierarchical decomposition of the project scope, but it doesn't inherently provide flexibility in planning. - Critical Path Method (CPM) is a technique for analyzing and managing project schedules, focusing on the critical path of activities. While useful for scheduling, it may not be the most suitable for dealing with high uncertainty. - Agile Product Roadmap provides a high-level view of the product vision and future releases but may not offer the same level of flexibility in planning as Rolling Wave Planning.

Correct Answer: Create detailed plans for near-term work packages and maintain high-level plans for later packages

Rolling Wave Planning is a method that embraces progressive elaboration, where near-term work is planned in detail while future work remains at a higher level until more information becomes available. The best approach is to create detailed plans for the work packages in the immediate future while maintaining high-level plans for later packages. This aligns perfectly with the Rolling Wave Planning methodology and allows for adaptability to technological changes. The other options are incorrect because: - Developing complete plans for all packages upfront is impractical when future technology is uncertain and may lead to extensive rework - Creating extensive detailed plans for all work packages would be inefficient and potentially wasteful given the technological uncertainties - Delaying all planning until technological clarity emerges would cause unnecessary project delays and prevent effective project initiation

Correct Answer: Work packages are progressively elaborated as more information becomes available

Rolling Wave Planning is a progressive elaboration technique where near-term work is planned in detail while future work is planned at a higher level. In this approach, work packages are detailed gradually as more project information emerges and uncertainty decreases. This aligns with the iterative nature of complex aerospace projects where requirements and specifications may evolve. The other options are incorrect because: Fully detailing work packages at project initiation would negate the benefits of rolling wave planning and reduce flexibility to adapt to changes. Defining packages completely at quarterly reviews would be too rigid and miss opportunities for ongoing refinement. Extensively documenting all packages during initial planning contradicts the progressive nature of rolling wave planning and would require unrealistic levels of early-stage detail for complex projects.