Sprint Goal Success

Correct Answer: The Product Owner, as they are responsible for the product's value

In the Scrum framework, the Product Owner is the one with the final say on whether the Sprint Goal has been met. This is because they are responsible for the product's value. The Product Owner has an understanding of what the client or market needs and can therefore judge whether the work done meets those needs. The Scrum Master's main role is to be a facilitator, making sure the team follows scrum principles and practices, and does not have the authority to decide on the product’s value. As for the team, although they do the actual work, they do not have the final authority on the product’s value or whether the goal is met. The stakeholders, on the other hand, are the final consumers of the value, but their decision is not final during the sprint review; it is the Product Owner's responsibility to represent their interests

Correct Answer: Arrange a review meeting involving the development team and the product owner to discuss users' feedback and revisit the Sprint Goal

The best response is to 'Arrange a review meeting involving the development team and the product owner to discuss users' feedback and revisit the Sprint Goal'. This action ensures that feedback is properly assessed and addressed. It is the essence of the Scrum framework to facilitate free flow of communication and abundant collaboration among team members for a better result which considers all user's experience. Ignoring users' feedback contradicts the Scrum approach, hence the option is incorrect. Instructing the team to make individual features better might not solve the problem as the issue might not necessarily be with the individual features but the overall user experience. Blaming the users also doesn't help the situation. The Scrum methodology encourages taking and incorporating feedbacks rather than blaming users. Hence, the other options are incorrect.

Correct Answer: Empower the development team by illustrating how the technical work aligns with the sprint goal, ensuring they understand the value and purpose behind the objectives.

The correct approach involves guiding the development team to see how their technical tasks contribute to the sprint goal, rather than micromanaging their work or adjusting the goals to fit their current focus. Frequent sprint reviews or overly specific technical specifications can distract from the process of self-organization and problem-solving capabilities. Adjusting the product backlog to fit the team’s current technical focus instead of the project objectives can veer off the project's intended outcome.