Back to PRINCE2 7 Practitioner (PRINCE2 Practitioner)

Initiating a Project Process

Apply and tailor project initiation to establish solid foundations.

Covers preparing management approaches (risk, quality, change control, communication), setting up project controls, creating the project plan, refining the business case, and assembling the Project Initiation Documentation (PID). Focuses on establishing solid foundations and analyzing whether approaches align with PRINCE2 practices.
5 minutes 5 Questions

In the context of PRINCE2 7, the 'Initiating a Project' (IP) process is the critical phase where the solid foundations for the project are established. It occurs within the initiation stage, immediately after the Project Board authorizes the project to proceed from the 'Starting a Project' process.…

Concepts covered: Prepare Risk Management Approach, Prepare Quality Management Approach, Prepare Change Control Approach, Set Up Project Controls, Create Project Plan, Refine Business Case, Assemble Project Initiation Documentation

Test mode:
Start practice test
PRINCE2 Practitioner - Initiating a Project Process Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Initiating a Project Process

Question 1

An energy company is establishing the Project Plan for deploying smart meter infrastructure across 12,000 residential and commercial properties in a metropolitan region. The Project Manager has the approved Project Brief specifying a €9.8 million budget and 32-month delivery period. The Project Product Description details the installation of smart meters, communication network infrastructure, backend data processing systems, and customer support capabilities. The Technical Director has provided resource estimates showing that installation teams can complete approximately 150 meters per week, requiring 80 working weeks of installation activity. The Customer Services Director has indicated that customer complaints historically increase during infrastructure projects and wants reassurance about service continuity. The Corporate Planning Manager has shared lessons learned from a similar utility project in another region, which revealed that seasonal weather conditions reduced installation productivity by 35% during winter months, and regulatory inspection processes added 3 weeks to each phase. The Regulatory Affairs Manager has confirmed that mandatory safety audits must occur after every 2,000 installations before proceeding further. The Programme Manager has stated that this project must coordinate with a concurrent billing system upgrade scheduled to go live in month 20. How should the Project Manager approach the integration of external dependencies and environmental factors when structuring the delivery approach in the Project Plan?

Correct Answer: Incorporate seasonal productivity variations and regulatory inspection requirements into the scheduling baseline, establishing stage boundaries aligned with the mandatory audit points and allowing buffer periods for weather-related adjustments while coordinating handover activities with the billing system upgrade timeline.

In PRINCE2 7, the Project Plan must realistically reflect external dependencies and environmental factors that will impact delivery. The Plans theme emphasizes that plans should be based on realistic estimates that incorporate known constraints and dependencies.

The correct approach demonstrates proper application of PRINCE2 planning principles by:

  1. Integrating Environmental Factors: The 35% winter productivity reduction is a quantified environmental factor that must be incorporated into the scheduling baseline, not treated as an assumption or contingency. PRINCE2 requires plans to reflect realistic working conditions.

  2. Aligning Stage Boundaries with Mandatory Controls: The regulatory audits after every 2,000 installations are mandatory decision points. PRINCE2's management by stages principle requires that stage boundaries should align with natural control points. With 12,000 meters requiring 6 audit points, structuring stages around these mandatory gates ensures proper governance.

  3. Coordinating External Dependencies: The billing system upgrade in month 20 is a hard external dependency managed at programme level. The Project Plan must coordinate handover activities rather than ignore or attempt to change this constraint, reflecting PRINCE2's emphasis on managing interfaces.

  4. Incorporating Buffer Periods: Weather-related adjustments require explicit schedule accommodation, not just contingency reserves, ensuring the plan remains realistic and achievable.

The second approach fails because it treats environmental factors as contingencies rather than baseline realities, attempts to parallelize mandatory sequential audits (which contradicts regulatory requirements), and inappropriately suggests changing programme-level dependencies that are outside project authority.

The third approach violates PRINCE2 principles by prioritizing speed over realistic planning and proper coordination. Frontloading to avoid winter ignores the 80-week installation duration that spans multiple seasons, and prioritizing completion over critical dependencies creates programme-level risks.

The fourth approach incorrectly treats known quantified impacts as assumptions requiring monitoring rather than facts requiring integration. Seasonal variations with documented 35% impact and confirmed regulatory processes are not assumptions but certainties that must be built into the baseline plan. This represents inadequate planning that would likely lead to repeated stage boundary reviews and plan revisions.

Question 2

An energy sector company is establishing a smart meter deployment project with an 18-month timeline and £4.8 million budget. The project comprises four management stages: pilot territory assessment (3 months, £600k), supply chain establishment (4 months, £1.2m), mass deployment (9 months, £2.4m), and system stabilization (2 months, £600k). The project board includes an Infrastructure Director as executive who manages eleven concurrent utility upgrade initiatives and can attend governance sessions only on the first Monday of each month, a Field Operations Manager as senior user who coordinates 85 installation technicians across six regions, and a Technology Procurement Manager as senior supplier. The mass deployment stage involves installing meters in 340,000 properties with regulatory obligations requiring completion milestones every quarter to maintain the operating license. The Infrastructure Director has stated that corporate policy mandates that any accumulated variance exceeding certain thresholds must trigger a formal review of project viability and continuation authority. The Field Operations Manager needs operational flexibility to manage daily installation rates that vary by 18-25% due to customer availability and property access challenges. During the mass deployment stage, team managers will authorize Work Packages to installation crews operating in different geographic zones. The project manager must establish how much deviation team managers can accommodate before escalating to the project manager, and how much the project manager can absorb before engaging the board. Historical deployment data shows typical daily productivity variations and occasional equipment supply delays lasting 3-5 days. Which control structure should the project manager establish for the tolerance hierarchy across project, stage, and Work Package levels during the mass deployment stage?

Correct Answer: Define project-level tolerances at +8% cost and +6% time with stage tolerances at +5% cost and +4% time for the deployment stage, and establish Work Package tolerances at +3% cost and +2 days time to enable team managers to manage daily operational variations while escalating systematic deviations

The correct answer establishes a properly cascading tolerance hierarchy that aligns with PRINCE2 7 principles for delegated authority and exception management.

Key considerations for this scenario:

  1. Tolerance Hierarchy Principles: PRINCE2 requires tolerances to cascade downward with each level having narrower tolerances than the level above. This ensures issues are escalated appropriately through management layers.

  2. Project-Level Context: The Infrastructure Director manages 11 concurrent initiatives and is only available monthly, indicating the need for reasonable but controlled project-level tolerances. The +8% cost and +6% time tolerances reflect corporate policy requirements for formal viability reviews while providing adequate flexibility.

  3. Stage-Level Requirements: The mass deployment stage has regulatory quarterly milestones and represents 50% of the project budget (£2.4m of £4.8m). Stage tolerances of +5% cost and +4% time are appropriately tighter than project level, allowing the project manager to manage variations without constant board escalation while maintaining regulatory compliance.

  4. Work Package Level: Team managers need operational flexibility for 18-25% daily installation rate variations and 3-5 day equipment delays. Work Package tolerances of +3% cost and +2 days provide sufficient flexibility for normal operational variations while ensuring systematic issues are escalated to the project manager promptly.

  5. Proper Cascading: This structure creates clear escalation points: team managers handle routine variations within +3%/+2 days, the project manager manages deviations up to +5%/+4%, and only variations exceeding +8%/+6% require board intervention.

The other options fail because:

  • One option sets stage tolerances equal to project tolerances, eliminating the proper hierarchy and defeating the purpose of delegated authority
  • Another reverses the hierarchy by making stage tolerances larger than project tolerances, which violates PRINCE2 governance principles
  • The third option provides excessive Work Package tolerances that would prevent timely escalation of systematic issues, allowing problems to compound before reaching appropriate management levels

The correct structure balances operational flexibility with appropriate governance controls across all three levels.

Question 3

A logistics company is initiating a 13-month warehouse automation project with a budget of £4.2 million, implementing robotic sorting systems, inventory management software, and automated loading docks across 5 distribution centers. The Project Manager is preparing the Change Control Approach and encounters several organizational considerations: The company's procurement policies mandate competitive tendering for any additional equipment purchases exceeding £25,000, which typically requires 6-8 weeks. The Operations Director has highlighted that warehouse operations run 24/7, and any system modifications must be coordinated with shift schedules to minimize disruption. The IT Security team requires all software changes to undergo penetration testing, which has a 3-week lead time. The company's Quality Assurance department has recently implemented ISO 9001:2015 certification and insists that all process changes must include impact assessments on quality procedures. Previous automation projects experienced significant timeline slippage when technical teams submitted change requests using inconsistent formats, making it difficult for decision-makers to assess impacts quickly. The Finance Director wants monthly reporting on change-related costs but has expressed frustration with previous projects where this information was compiled manually. What should be the Project Manager's PRIMARY consideration when defining the procedures and formats for documenting and communicating changes?

Correct Answer: Establish standardized templates and documentation requirements that capture essential information for decision-making while aligning with the organization's procurement timelines, operational constraints, and quality assurance protocols

The PRIMARY consideration when defining procedures and formats for documenting and communicating changes should be establishing standardized templates and documentation requirements that capture essential information for decision-making while aligning with organizational constraints.

This is the correct approach because:

  1. Addresses the core problem: The scenario explicitly states that previous automation projects experienced significant timeline slippage due to inconsistent formats from technical teams, making it difficult for decision-makers to assess impacts quickly. Standardization directly resolves this issue.

  2. Balances comprehensiveness with efficiency: The approach focuses on capturing 'essential information' rather than excessive detail, which enables faster decision-making while still providing adequate information.

  3. Aligns with PRINCE2 7 principle of 'Tailor to suit the project': The templates acknowledge multiple organizational constraints (procurement timelines of 6-8 weeks for purchases over £25,000, 24/7 operations requiring coordination, 3-week security testing lead times, and ISO 9001:2015 requirements) without being overly prescriptive.

  4. Supports effective change control: Standardization enables consistent evaluation, comparison of changes, and integration with existing processes.

Why the other answers are less appropriate:

The second option suggests comprehensive forms requiring detailed specifications regardless of change magnitude. This contradicts PRINCE2's proportionate approach and could create unnecessary bureaucracy for minor changes, slowing down the process rather than improving it.

The third option proposes flexible guidelines allowing teams to use preferred formats. This directly contradicts the identified problem of inconsistent formats causing assessment difficulties and timeline slippage. Flexibility without standardization would perpetuate existing issues.

The fourth option focuses specifically on ISO 9001:2015 integration and automated cost tracking. While these are important considerations, they represent specific requirements rather than the PRIMARY consideration. This approach is too narrow and doesn't address the fundamental issue of standardization for effective decision-making across all stakeholder groups (procurement, operations, IT security, quality, and finance).

More Initiating a Project Process questions
267 questions (total)
Start 100 question test